Older Americans Will Suffer If White House Cuts HIV Funding

President Trump’s latest proposal would allow health insurance plans to limit the HIV/AIDS medications they cover through Medicare Part D.

Patients relying on Medicare Part D, would be one of six “protected classes” now denied access to their needed medicines. The proposal is shortsighted, as it surely will not save the costs projected in the proposed budget. This is because of the rise in health costs, hospitalization and far more expensive acute treatment and strains on health systems, including in the mental health arena.

This can be cited in the AJMC 2018 study, which found roughly $2.28 billion in additional costs, which was a result of HIV more restrictive formularies not unlike those being proposed now.

The more interesting idea that emerges from this regulatory blunder is what it represents in regard to the relationship between health policy and our aging society.

The mere fact that we are debating whether to pay for newer, more effective, innovative HIV/ AIDS medications under Medicare Part D is a serious and profoundly significant moment.

Have we forgotten that it was only 30 years ago that HIV/AIDS was a certain death sentence, but now we have aging HIV patients and patients who are able to live fulfilling lives with the disease.

This stunning reality means we have now entered the third phase, where HIV-infected patients have joined the rest of us to “become old.”

That an HIV patient can qualify for this Medicare program is a big deal and it reflects the miracle of our national and global medical-scientific journey of discovery, innovation and treatment.

It wasn’t that long ago that President Ronald Reagan first talked publicly about the unspeakable and stigmatized disease. He began the funding process, which led Congress to allocate almost three times more than what he requested.

Why would we now threaten to cap the progress we’ve made for aging HIV patients?  It is something every administration — in the past 35-years — has done to give hope to people through access to innovative medicines and enabling them to have the possibility of a long life.

It is a particular irony that this proposed regulation stands in the way of further progress and threatens to push us backward.

Denying access through clever, if misinformed, tactics — such as prior authorization and step-therapy — will not only adversely affect the progress we have seen, it will become a version of the most reviled and ultimately defeated parts of the Affordable Care Act: those death panels that we feared would decide who does and does not get access to medical and health interventions.

This proposal is not consistent with the cross-aisle claims for supporting funding to pre-existing conditions. AIDS has always been a sort of social barometer for moral clarity, one fears these steps backward also represent the proverbial slippery slope for other tragic disease areas, from cancer to Alzheimer’s.

President Trump, his HHS Secretary Alex Azar and their Administrator of Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services Seema Verma should intervene. Congress could take a position — one that surely would be bipartisan — both following in the tradition of Ronald Reagan and all who followed. There is no reason to not stay on the right side of history on this issue.

Source: The Hill

Latest Developments

We keep our members and partners in touch with the most recent updates and opinions in the worldwide dialogue on population longevity and related issues.

Global Coalition on Aging Workshop Calls on G7 Countries to Fund Pull Incentives to Spur Antibiotic Innovation

The Global Coalition on Aging, in partnership with JPMA, today announced the release of its workshop report on the AMR crisis facing G7 countries and the world, “The Value of Pull Incentives in Japan to Encourage Investment in Antibiotic Innovation to Solve the AMR Crisis.” If strong action is not taken to address AMR, we will lose the antibiotics we need to cure infections, which is likely to outpace cancer as a major cause of death, killing an estimated 10 million by 2050.

Our National Conversation on Aging

Now that President Biden officially declared his run for a second term, what are we to make of the countless warnings about his age? Clearly, voters have already considered age a major factor – Google Search results for ‘Biden age’ hit an all-time-high just before the 2020 election – and speculation has only heightened four years on. Unfortunately, these concerns are misguided and even dangerous because they conflate age with poor health and confuse ideas about work and retirement.

World Immunization Week: Best-Kept Secret for 21st-Century Healthy Aging

The tremendous success of childhood immunisation campaigns across the 20thcentury is one of the greatest triumphs of public health. Along with advances in sanitation and antibiotics, childhood immunisation has resulted in the miracle of modern longevity: the once extravagant prospect of growing old has become the norm. Now, in our 21st century, isn’t it our great challenge to build on this achievement by realising a healthy longevity?

South China Morning Post Letter to the Editor

Antimicrobial resistance is one of the defining global problems of our time. Drug-resistant bacterial infections killed an estimated 1.27 million people in 2019. By 2050, 10 million lives annually could be lost to antimicrobial resistance, and annual global gross domestic product could fall by between 1.1 per cent and 3.8 per cent. Fortunately, Chinese policymakers, physicians and patients have shown what is possible when they focus collective efforts on antimicrobial resistance.

Medicine Price Setting Might Appeal to Voters but Will Cost Patients

As policymakers search for potential cuts to the national budget, they risk jeopardizing the country’s most cost-effective use of healthcare dollars: biomedical innovation regarding vaccines , prescription drugs, and emerging therapies, including antibodies. As the nation rapidly ages, protecting this pipeline of medicine will not only improve health outcomes but will do so at a lower cost by reducing more expensive hospital and primary care.

Global Coalition on Aging Hosts Cross-Sector Roundtable to Tackle Heart Valve Disease in Aging Societies

The Global Coalition on Aging (GCOA) and the Global Heart Hub have released a global position paper “Heart Valve Disease: Harnessing Innovation to Save Lives, Mitigate Costs, and Advance the Healthy Aging Agenda.” The report builds upon on a December 2022 GCOA-GHH roundtable of cross-sector experts and examines how behavior and policy change can best address heart valve disease in our 21st century.

New York City Twins with Ireland to Develop Age Friendly Communities

The twinning commits both sides to share knowledge on age friendly programs and builds on the 2011 Dublin Declaration of Age-Friendly Cities and Communities. The agreement was signed by the Cathaoirleach (Mayor) Nick Killian of Meath County Council which hosts the Irish Age Friendly Programme and Lorraine Cortés-Vázquez, Commissioner for Aging.

Just Getting Started at 75

In the latest charge against the promise of healthy aging, Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, oncologist and bioethicist, doubled down on his infamous 2014 essay stating that 75 is the ideal age to die. Now 65, he maintains that after age 75, he will no longer receive medical screenings and interventions like colonoscopies, cancer treatment, flu shots, and heart valve replacement.