Dream Retirement Differs For Gays And Lesbians

When you hear retirement plan you might think that everyone has the same vision of lazy days, with not a care in the world and sipping cocktails on the beach. But it shouldn’t come as a surprise that many in the LGBT community have different goals when it comes to their dream retirement. These goals may only differ slightly but they differ all the same. How the LGBT community prepares for retirement also differs, according to a new report. The Aegon Center for Longevity and Retirement recently partnered with the Transamerica Center for Retirement Studies to survey the retirement goals of the LGBT community.

Compared to their heterosexual colleagues, LGBT employees are more likely to have taken the steps of drafting a written financial plan and planning for retirement. While this good news indicates the retirement readiness of many in the LGBT community, the study also reports that many gays and lesbians are less likely to save for retirement on a consistent basis. While there are many who take the step to plan, there are others who are less likely to save anything at all.

One reason for the lack of saving is a lack of children. Even with marriage equality, gay men were reportedly more likely to be single. As a group, members of the LGBT community were less likely to have dependent children. No big shock there. If you are single and without kids you may never have had the need to really get serious about money.

Additionally, members of the LGBT community are less likely to spend time with their families during retirement . Living alone, without as many family ties, can affect many of the retirement choices one makes. Not having the responsibility to care for a child provides more flexibility for travel around the world or even a move to some exotic location. While this may sound great, it can also lead to increased isolation as we age.

Lack of children can often translate into lack of support in retirement. This will often change the hard numbers of your retirement income needs, not to mention where you hope to leave money. Who will be around to help care for you as you age? Be sure to read “Who Will Care for LGBT Boomers,” where this topic is covered more in depth. Everyone faces these issues as they age, but they are especially poignant for those retiring without children. Since the majority of the LGBT community aren’t parents, they will have to look elsewhere for care and most of the time set aside money to pay for that care.

Setting aside money and saving for retirement is challenging for the LGBT community. A reported 31% of LGBT singles said they had made sure to put money towards retirement. The number jumped to 47% for those who were married or had a civil partner. Translating that into real life, it means something like 50% or more of the community has little to nothing saved for retirement.

Heterosexuals have challenges as well but appear to be doing much better. Forty-six percent of heterosexuals in long-term relationships ensured that they had saved money for retirement while just 41% of heterosexual singles did.

The numbers indicate that members of the LGBT community and heterosexuals show similar levels of readiness for retirement. But don’t plan a party just yet. Many people are still behind when it comes to saving for retirement. Eighty-four percent of LGBT workers felt they had taken responsible steps towards having sufficient income during retirement. Compare that to 92% of heterosexual workers.  I believe this survey may be a bit skewed. A reported 50% of workers have nothing saved which will equal virtually no income in retirement. Living off Social Security will be difficult because the average benefit is below $1,400 per month for the year 2018. Would that even cover your rent?

Sixty-one percent of LGBT workers, compared to 57% of heterosexual workers, make a habit of saving, according to this report. This is much higher than expected and reported in other surveys of the U.S. population as a whole. Almost half of the respondents said they were on course to achieve three-quarters or more of what’s needed for their LGBT retirement. While that may sound good to some, will you be able to live off 75% of your current income during your retirement years? I know I won’t. Nor would I want to. I expect to spend more in retirement because I’ll have the freedom to spend money 24/7.

Sadly, many have to leave the work force before choosing to do so. This could put a big dent in the percentage of people who are actually on track to replace ¾ of their incomes in retirement. Retiring earlier than planned means you had less time to save. It also means invested money had less time to compound its growth. In addition, taking Social Security before full retirement age can dramatically reduce your benefits.

The online survey was conducted by Cicero Group and included 900 working or retired participants from nine countries, including the U.S., who identified as either lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender.

To view the full report, click here.

Source: Forbes

Latest Developments

We keep our members and partners in touch with the most recent updates and opinions in the worldwide dialogue on population longevity and related issues.

Global Coalition on Aging Workshop Calls on G7 Countries to Fund Pull Incentives to Spur Antibiotic Innovation

The Global Coalition on Aging, in partnership with JPMA, today announced the release of its workshop report on the AMR crisis facing G7 countries and the world, “The Value of Pull Incentives in Japan to Encourage Investment in Antibiotic Innovation to Solve the AMR Crisis.” If strong action is not taken to address AMR, we will lose the antibiotics we need to cure infections, which is likely to outpace cancer as a major cause of death, killing an estimated 10 million by 2050.

Our National Conversation on Aging

Now that President Biden officially declared his run for a second term, what are we to make of the countless warnings about his age? Clearly, voters have already considered age a major factor – Google Search results for ‘Biden age’ hit an all-time-high just before the 2020 election – and speculation has only heightened four years on. Unfortunately, these concerns are misguided and even dangerous because they conflate age with poor health and confuse ideas about work and retirement.

World Immunization Week: Best-Kept Secret for 21st-Century Healthy Aging

The tremendous success of childhood immunisation campaigns across the 20thcentury is one of the greatest triumphs of public health. Along with advances in sanitation and antibiotics, childhood immunisation has resulted in the miracle of modern longevity: the once extravagant prospect of growing old has become the norm. Now, in our 21st century, isn’t it our great challenge to build on this achievement by realising a healthy longevity?

South China Morning Post Letter to the Editor

Antimicrobial resistance is one of the defining global problems of our time. Drug-resistant bacterial infections killed an estimated 1.27 million people in 2019. By 2050, 10 million lives annually could be lost to antimicrobial resistance, and annual global gross domestic product could fall by between 1.1 per cent and 3.8 per cent. Fortunately, Chinese policymakers, physicians and patients have shown what is possible when they focus collective efforts on antimicrobial resistance.

Medicine Price Setting Might Appeal to Voters but Will Cost Patients

As policymakers search for potential cuts to the national budget, they risk jeopardizing the country’s most cost-effective use of healthcare dollars: biomedical innovation regarding vaccines , prescription drugs, and emerging therapies, including antibodies. As the nation rapidly ages, protecting this pipeline of medicine will not only improve health outcomes but will do so at a lower cost by reducing more expensive hospital and primary care.

Global Coalition on Aging Hosts Cross-Sector Roundtable to Tackle Heart Valve Disease in Aging Societies

The Global Coalition on Aging (GCOA) and the Global Heart Hub have released a global position paper “Heart Valve Disease: Harnessing Innovation to Save Lives, Mitigate Costs, and Advance the Healthy Aging Agenda.” The report builds upon on a December 2022 GCOA-GHH roundtable of cross-sector experts and examines how behavior and policy change can best address heart valve disease in our 21st century.

New York City Twins with Ireland to Develop Age Friendly Communities

The twinning commits both sides to share knowledge on age friendly programs and builds on the 2011 Dublin Declaration of Age-Friendly Cities and Communities. The agreement was signed by the Cathaoirleach (Mayor) Nick Killian of Meath County Council which hosts the Irish Age Friendly Programme and Lorraine Cortés-Vázquez, Commissioner for Aging.

Just Getting Started at 75

In the latest charge against the promise of healthy aging, Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, oncologist and bioethicist, doubled down on his infamous 2014 essay stating that 75 is the ideal age to die. Now 65, he maintains that after age 75, he will no longer receive medical screenings and interventions like colonoscopies, cancer treatment, flu shots, and heart valve replacement.